ESM Installation Performed by US Energy Solutions

ELocation: Navy Exchange Facility- Orlando, FLJanuary 6, 2009
SUMMARY
Overall average kWh savings was 19.84% or 1,321.8 kWh during the dates compared. Internal temperature performance was excellent during the "OFF" and "ON" periods. The internal humidity performance was similar between the "OFF" periods & the "ON" periods. During the Test Period an average of 264.36 kWh were saved per day. Once seasonal weather adjustments are factored in the total estimated savings are 115,307.22 kWh per year. The Navy Exchange Facility installation of the ESM has also provided significant environmental benefits. The annual kWh savings is equivalent to the amount of electricity required to supply approximately 11 homes and will reduce annual Greenhouse gas emissions by 155,535 pounds. To absorb an equivalent amount of greenhouse gases, one would have to plant 85 acres of trees.

GOAL
To demonstrate that the ESM will reduce the kWh usage of the Tyler Refrigeration racks located in the Navy Exchange Facility in Orlando, FL while maintaining pre-set temperature performance.

REQUIRED MEASUREMENTS

  • kWh required to operate the refrigeration racks in its current configuration
  • Inside air temperature and humidity under the current configuration
  • Outside air temperature and humidity under the current configuration
  • kWh required to operate the refrigerating racks with the ESM operating
  • Inside air temperature and humidity with the ESM operating
  • Outside air temperature and humidity with the ESM operating
TEST FACILITY
The Navy Exchange Facility is a building located at 7151 Earhart Drive in Orlando, Florida 32827.

REFRIGERATION PLANT & CONTROLS
The test was conducted on two (2) Tyler Refrigeration Racks. Rack 1 consists of 3 compressors and Rack 2 consists of 4 compressors.

TEST PERIOD
Testing of the system has occurred during the following dates:
  • Friday, December 19th , 2008 - ESM placed into 7 Day Bypass (OFF) to begin test (Transition Day)
  • Saturday, December 20th , 2008 - 1st Full Day of Comparative OFF Data
  • Monday, December 22nd, 2008 - Unusually low ambient temperature recorded for Orlando area
  • Friday, December 26th , 2008 - ESM automatically switches into SAVE (ON) Mode at noon (Transition Day)
  • Saturday, December 27th , 2008 - 1st Full Day for Comparative ON Data
  • Friday, January 2nd, 2009 - Test complete and data collected (Transition Day)
TEST METHODOLOGY
During the evaluation period, the current / amperage draw of one phase on each refrigeration compressor was monitored and logged. Inside air temperature and humidity were also logged. Outside air temperature and humidity were tracked using the http://www.wunderground.com/ on-line tool.

The data loggers for the current / amperage draw took data samples every 8 seconds with an accumulated record every 1 minute. This method is extremely accurate providing 1440 measures per day for the evaluation period. The data loggers for internal temperature and humidity took data samples every 1 minute. This method is extremely accurate providing 1440 measures per day for the evaluation period. Either or both sets of raw data can be made available upon request.


SAVINGS RESULTS
The same days of the week having similar ambient temperature were compared to determine the savings level of the ESM during the test. The data collection/transition days were not used in the results as these were not full days for comparison and both the comparative Mondays for OFF and ON data were not used due to large swings in ambient temperature.

When we look at the above ESM Off versus ESM On dates the savings results are as follows:


DAY
DATE
STATUS
kWh
TEMP
HUMID
SAVINGS
Day 1- Saturday
20-Dec-08
OFF
1383.91
67.00
76.00
 
27-Dec-08
ON
1126.05
70.00
74.00
-19%
Day 2- Sunday
21-Dec-08
OFF
1372.78
66.00
76.00
28-Dec-08
ON
1103.64
70.00
73.00
-20%
Day 3- Tuesday
23-Dec-08
OFF
1267.78
59.00
71.00
30-Dec-08
ON
1053.54
63.00
58.00
-17%
Day 4- Wednesday
24-Dec-08
OFF
1334.12
70.00
76.00
31-Dec-08
ON
1059.51
61.00
73.00
-21%
Day 5- Thursday
25-Dec-08
OFF
1304.92
73.00
76.00
01-Jan-09
ON
998.97
60.00
63.00
-23%
TOTAL ESM OFF kWh
   
6663.51
kWh
SAVE
SAVINGS %
TOTAL ESM ON kWh
   
5341.71

 

 
19.8%




INTERNAL TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY
  • Internal Temperature The internal temperature was minimally affected by the implementation of the ESM.
  • Internal Humidity The internal humidity was relatively consistent between the ESM ON and OFF periods.
EXTERNAL TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY
The graphs below illustrate the external temperature and humidity across the test periods.

External Ambient Temperature






External Ambient Humidity






DATA EXPLANATION

Facility
  • AMPERAGE
    Amperage draw of one phase of each refrigeration unit was recorded utilizing an ACR SmartReader3 data logger. Data samples were taken every 8 seconds with an accumulated record every 1 minute. The readings were then totaled for the individual weeks and averaged for a daily number in the table above.

  • INTERNAL AMBIENT CONDITIONS
    Both the internal temperature and humidity were recorded utilizing the ACR SmartReader2 data logger. Data samples were taken every 1 minute. The readings were then averaged for a daily number in the table above.

  • EXTERNAL AMBIENT CONDITIONS
    Hourly temperature and humidity readings for Orlando, Florida were downloaded from the Weather Underground website http://www.wunderground.com/. The average temperature and humidity for the week were then inserted in the table above.

  • AMPERAGE TO kWh CONVERSION
    To convert amperage to kWh, you must first convert the single phase to three phase. This is done by multiplying the amperage by 1.73 and the assumed power factor of 0.9. The three phase amperage is then multiplied by the voltage (460) to determine the Watts which are divided by 1000 to produce KW. The KW are then divided by the data points recorded per hour (60). This is then the kWh used by the system during the test period.
  • SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT
    A properly sized system will run at full load for less than 2% of the year. Therefore, the load on the system will fluctuate throughout the year based on internal and external heat loads. The average annual load factor for refrigeration for the Orlando, FL area is 75% for external temperature. The load factor during the test period was an average of 62.7%. As a result of this the annualized savings listed in the summary above has been adjusted by a seasonal correction factor of 1.195.

Facility: 500,000 square foot distribution center in Chino, CA.

Project scope of work: Retrofit of 475 existing 400 watt HID fixtures with six lamp T8 fixtures; many which had motion sensors added to the fixtures to increase energy savings in low traffic areas. The goal was to reduce energy costs, while also improving light quality in the facility. Energy savings modules were also installed on all roof top HVAC units to increase the efficiency of the compressor cycles and reduce energy costs.

Energy costs and consumption prior to installation of lighting and HVAC systems:

  • Annual KWH’s – 2,701,964
  • Annual cost- $ 378,274

Energy costs and consumption post installation of lighting and HVAC systems:

  • Annual KWH’s- 1,719,262
  • Annual Cost- $ 240,696
  • KWH reduction- 36.37%
  • Annual savings- $ 137,578
  • Project cost- $ 187,500
  • Southern California Edison rebate- $ 70,000
  • Project cost with rebate- $ 117,500
  • Return on investment- .85 years

Before

After

 

 

 
 
* A free energy savings consulta tion for your facility
* Tips and ideas about new and exciting energy savings strategies
* Rebate and tax incentive information for many energy savings solutions
Name:
* Email:
 
US Energy Solutions, Inc © 2008